Sennheiser HD-1000
發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 11:26 am
--
全世界的個人網站版工中，最遜、最窮的一個就素偶
第 1 頁 (共 1 頁)
發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 11:26 am發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 12:40 pm這隻以前也有看過照片, 沒實際聽過, 流口水流滿地了
--
全世界的個人網站版工中，最遜、最窮的一個就素偶
--
全世界的個人網站版工中，最遜、最窮的一個就素偶
發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 5:18 pm什麼.........HD-100:mad::mad::mad::mad:
--------------------------------
不要引誘我了..........
我......:cry:
-----------------------
是非兩面看 : 困難似金錢
工作是表現 : 偷學古聖賢
--------------------------------
不要引誘我了..........
我......
:cry:
-----------------------
是非兩面看 : 困難似金錢
工作是表現 : 偷學古聖賢
發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 7:09 pmTo newmansill,
少打一個0
他的等級會比HD600高嗎?I doubt!
Crazy HeadPhone Guy
Jesse Chen
少打一個0
他的等級會比HD600高嗎?I doubt!
Crazy HeadPhone Guy
Jesse Chen
發表於 : 週三 5月 01, 2002 8:48 pm不會吧,這是1992年前的老機啦,已停產,據大
陸網友說單體同HD495:?:
陸網友說單體同HD495:?:
發表於 : 週四 5月 02, 2002 12:33 am復古風.... 口水滿地流啊.....
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 8:29 am与HD495根本两会事，扭以千里。
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 8:47 amAnother notes:
The technical data of HD1000 and other SENNHEISER headphone is totally different:
For example:nominal impedence is 140om ,and Frequency response
is 18-25khz(-3DB)
It is called CHARLESTON,for SEENEISER's 50th anniversary.
Cost 3900RMB in 1993.
So every one can tell the difference,no matter say when you get
chance to listen it.
I know there are only 4 persons in China get chance to hear that.
So think about why there are someone assault the reviews of
Mr.wu tong?
This is so called JDDSY's phenomena.
The technical data of HD1000 and other SENNHEISER headphone is totally different:
For example:nominal impedence is 140om ,and Frequency response
is 18-25khz(-3DB)
It is called CHARLESTON,for SEENEISER's 50th anniversary.
Cost 3900RMB in 1993.
So every one can tell the difference,no matter say when you get
chance to listen it.
I know there are only 4 persons in China get chance to hear that.
So think about why there are someone assault the reviews of
Mr.wu tong?
This is so called JDDSY's phenomena.
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 9:08 am請問HD-1000現代較接近的比較組耳機是哪一款呢?
單體看起來不是很大顆的樣子...
也沒有大耳罩...
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
單體看起來不是很大顆的樣子...
也沒有大耳罩...
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 9:56 am从国外流传的消息说是HD1000的单元跟433一样，我不是很相信的。
可惜我也扔砖头了，这会砸自己脚了。
:aa::aa:
可惜我也扔砖头了，这会砸自己脚了。
:aa::aa:發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 6:05 pmThis is a rumor from headfi and distribute by TV (dian shi)in mainland China .
I wrote to SENNHEISER to testify this,but no answer.
But we can see that 433 or 435 is a product after 1996-1997,
and HD1000 is the one of 1992.
433 or 435 is 32om
but hd1000 is 140om,
THD for 433 or 435 is 1%
HD1000 IS <0.3%.
FR of hd1000 is 18-25000hz(-3db)
FR OF 433 is 22-20000hz(???db)
and 433 is about 500rmb in 2002
HD1000 IS 3900RMB IN 1993
BTW,the average monthly income of CHINESE MAINLAND
graduate student is 250rmb in 1992 and 2000rmb in 2002.
so I believe it is just like what we think about OMEGA2 now;
the price of HD1000 for 1992 is really unbelievable.
So You can see the difference.
I wrote to SENNHEISER to testify this,but no answer.
But we can see that 433 or 435 is a product after 1996-1997,
and HD1000 is the one of 1992.
433 or 435 is 32om
but hd1000 is 140om,
THD for 433 or 435 is 1%
HD1000 IS <0.3%.
FR of hd1000 is 18-25000hz(-3db)
FR OF 433 is 22-20000hz(???db)
and 433 is about 500rmb in 2002
HD1000 IS 3900RMB IN 1993
BTW,the average monthly income of CHINESE MAINLAND
graduate student is 250rmb in 1992 and 2000rmb in 2002.
so I believe it is just like what we think about OMEGA2 now;
the price of HD1000 for 1992 is really unbelievable.
So You can see the difference.
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 8:48 pm從規格跟價錢看起來，HD1000可能是Sennheiser的老旗艦..
------------------
神不為者
人自為之
------------------
------------------
神不為者
人自為之
------------------
發表於 : 週六 5月 04, 2002 9:22 pmIt was a flagship a little earlier than HD580
But it was a limited edition.
BTW,I would be appaciated if somefriends could give me suggestion about how to convert gb code to big5.
But it was a limited edition.
BTW,I would be appaciated if somefriends could give me suggestion about how to convert gb code to big5.
發表於 : 週日 5月 05, 2002 1:40 am請愛用M$ Word...
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
----------------------------------
尋找好聲音，靠的是器材。
令人感動的聲音，才能算是好音樂。
發表於 : 週日 5月 05, 2002 10:28 am谷雨，你用汉字平台或者WORD都可以转繁体字的，但是我感觉没有繁体中文的WINDOWS都不好用，我就是用简体，没大问题的。
發表於 : 週一 5月 06, 2002 8:26 am多谢两位朋友。:)
發表於 : 週一 5月 06, 2002 9:50 am谢啥，我就是喜欢扔砖头的烂TV呀。:haha::haha::haha: